Judge forbids the fruit of poisonous tree to protect basic human rights – Opinion |nation.co.ke

Posted: March 4, 2012 by scaryhouse in Uncategorized


Justice James Makau’s ruling in the Meru Police Station case of misconduct is the first by the new-look Judiciary to strike a deadly blow, and provide a powerful remedy, to police misbehaviour and violation of constitutional rights.

The landmark ruling, as reported by the official Kenya Law Reports, sends a clear message to the whole of the police force that the courts will no longer turn a blind eye to police misconduct.

In his ruling in Antony Murithi v OCS Meru Police Station & 2 others, Justice Makau forbids the OCS (officer commanding police station), police constable Antony Horo and the Attorney General from using evidence illegally obtained from Antony Murithi, accused of rape.

The ruling makes a sea change in the administration of justice. It places Kenya almost on par with the United States where the exclusionary rule of evidence forbids, with a few exceptions, illegally obtained evidence from being admitted in a criminal trial.

By a stroke of Justice Makau’s pen, Kenya has thus departed from the English position, which is the opposite of the American position.

England follows an inclusionary practice where all relevant and reliable evidence is admissible, regardless of how it was obtained, though judges have the discretion — rarely used — to exclude evidence if to admit it would result in an unfair trial.

The American exclusionary rule exists as a means of enforcing people’s rights.

The Supreme Court established the rule in 1914 as the only effective means of enforcing people’s constitutional rights, including freedom from illegal arrest, unreasonable searches and seizures, coercive action or interrogation.

Share This Story


Americans call illegally obtained evidence “the fruit of the poisonous tree”. The poisonous tree is the evidence seized in an illegal action.

The fruit of this poisonous tree is the evidence derived from the illegal act. Both are excluded from a criminal trial.

The Meru police violated the rights of Antony Murithi.

The Constitution provides that every person who is arrested must be informed promptly in a language he understands that he has the right to remain silent and to communicate with an advocate.

They held him and denied him access to a lawyer. Then on the third day, they secretly removed him from the cells, handcuffed him and took him to Meru General Hospital, according to his testimony.

On arrival, he asked why he was taken there. Police constable Antony Horo, who escorted him, told him that he had no business knowing why he was there.

Then he was taken into a small room and ordered to sit on the floor. His hands and legs were handcuffed, and someone claiming to be a clinical officer took a syringe and forcefully removed blood from his body.

via Judge forbids the fruit of poisonous tree to protect basic human rights – Opinion |nation.co.ke.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s