History was made today! The ordinary citizens of Rockford, Illinois, were given a unheard of look at the short-comings of our police department when the City of Rockford released the results of the independent review and report it commissioned from Independent Assessment & Monitoring LLP, of Oakland, CA, of the events that led to the Mark Anthony Barmore shooting and his death on August 24, 2009. The findings of the independent review are posted on the Rockford Register-Star website here, including an podcast of a press conference conducted today.
We urge readers to fully read and pay attention to the details provided in the FULL REPORT also posted on the same RRSTAR page. Any Rockfordian who reads the full report and the 27 changes the review recommends will be deeply concerned over the inadequacies shown to exist at the Rockford Police Department and the indications scattered throughout the report showing the department’s tendency to disregard and downplay critical incidents such the Barmore shooting.
There has been a lot of community criticism focused on Barmore’s criminal history and the alleged shortcomings of other members of the Barmore family, as well as the actions of the Browns. Most commentors have implied (if not stating outright) that Barmore’s death was deserved and that the concerns expressed by other individuals are not legitimite but seek to profit at the expense of the police officers who, it is maintained, acted correctly. The release of today’s report should put to rest all of these criticisms as it reveals a substantial and impartial basis for questioning the legitimacy of the actions taken by officers Oda Poole and Stan North during their attempt to arrest Mark Anthony Barmore.The most critical parts of the review findings with respect to Poole and North focus upon the lack of judgment it is alleged that they exhibited and a disregard for recommended police procedure they showed before confronting Barmore. The report concludes that their actions worked to create a confrontational situation that unnecessarily endangered themselves and the public.
The report goes on though to point out as contributory, a cascade of multiple deficiencies in training, supervision, investigation, and event reporting and tracking throughout the Rockford Police Department which exist and which reveal severe cracks in the foundation of the Department’s operations. At bedrock, the fault of the Barmore shooting may rest with individual decisions made by Poole and North, but the Rockford Police Department is far from blameless. The city was recently criticized for holding back for several years the release of the results of a survey of police members critical of Department operations. Now, the city has to be commended for being upfront in publicly releasing these findings. We certainly thank the city wholeheartedly and hope that it’s action was prompted by it’s recognition of the need for fundamental change in the police department rather than the pressure of the public scrutiny from the Barmore shooting.
No local police survey can compare to this thorough evaluation and comparison of the Rockford Police Department’s policy and operations to that of the comparable, modern “best practices” of other municipal police departments in the nation. The Rockford Police Department falls far short in a number of areas. Two of these primarily concern us:
We have pointed out the apparent unwillingness of the Rockford Police Department (unlike most) to videotape and audiotape suspect interrogations and how that lack can contribute to police abuses in evidence gathering. This report cites in several locations how the absence of the Department’s use of photographs, video and audio taping of the officers, witnesses, and the evidence hindered the reviewers investigation and fails to meet both professional standards and best practices used in the industry. While the review recommends these practices be revised in relation to officer shootings, there is no reason why they should not also apply to normal casework.
Scattered throughout the reviewers attempts to investigate the Barmore shooting are their findings of procedures not followed and evidence not gathered which had they been obtained could have or would likely have been critical of the individual actions of both Poole and North. In other words, failings in the follow-up and investigation of the Barmore shooting subsequent to the shooting. Reading between the lines of the report in our opinion shows an internal disinclination or inability within the Rockford Police Department to question the actions of it’s officers along the lines of misconduct. This can have serious ramifications to individual accountability within the department and to community relations. A police department that cannot police itself, cannot be trusted to be impartial by the community which it serves. It gives rise to incidents such as the Barmore shooting. Bottom line: there are still individuals who believe that if the House of Grace Church had been located on the “good side” of town, then Poole and North would probably have thought twice before acting as they did in pursuit of Barmore. And, many have pointed out that the Department’s and City’s initial quick disregard of community outrage over the incident served no one’s interests of justice.
We simply cannot urge our readers more to read the FULL REPORT for all the findings!
Some questions remain. The Winnebago County State’s Attorney’s office acted quickly in December in ensuring a Grand Jury review of possible criminal charges for Poole and North; did the office recognize or have advance wind of the validity of possible future review findings such as these? Could that Grand Jury review be re-opened? If the Brown’s can be prosecuted for “supposed mistruths”, should not Poole and North be prosecuted for multiple failures to follow established procedures and any omissions of information? It will be interesting to see. Certainly today’s findings open both officers, the City and the Rockford Police Department to possible liability in civil court.
Last, and where was our local media investigation in all of this?

Leave a comment