RichardWanke.Com

  • UPDATE:

    Four years have passed since Greg Clark's February 6, 2008, murder. No one has been charged for his murder, but Richard Wanke and Diane Chavez remain under a cloud of suspicion, and the Rockford Police and State continue to prosecute Diane Chavez. We believe it is time for the media and Rockford community to question the conduct of the Clark murder investigation and to urge the authorities to drop the prosecution against Diane Chavez.
  • Four Years of Injustice!

    Read our summarization of the events of the 4 year old investigation to date and our perspective as to why the allegations made against Richard Wanke, and Diane Chavez, are wrong. Please click on the tab on "Year Four: Where the Clark Murder Investigation Stands" in the top left center area of this page to read why we believe the investigation went astray and not only needs to be redone, but the charges against Diane Chavez also immediately dropped.
  • Richard Needs Your Help on Appeal!

    Richard will be filing a post-conviction petition in June 2012, and needs help. Please click on the "Help Needed" tab to read further. You can find all of his appeal court filings by clicking on the tab "Richard's Appeal Briefs.
  • Massive Clark Murder Investigation Fails to Link Richard or Diane

    Incidentally, the State's evidence comprising it's case against Richard and Diane (consisting of over 700 pages containing over 200 individual Rockford police reports and evidence summations) has been reviewed by an authoritative source who found nothing contained in that information which links either Richard or Diane to any involvement in Clark's murder other than the original claimed "witness reports" in February 2008. No DNA, no fingerprints, no weapon, no gunpowder residue, no questionable contacts, phone records, or transactions: nothing, zilch....
  • Why does this blog exist?

    On February 6, 2008, our friends, Richard Wanke and Diane Chavez, were arrested in alleged connection to the murder of a well-respected, local attorney, Gregory Clark. The vague scenario the Rockford police have submitted is problematic and more than three years later; the Rockford police still haven't been able to build enough of a case to charge Richard or Diane (or anyone else) with anything connected to the murder. We know Richard and Diane as gentle people; local community activists, who routinely participate in volunteer projects in the community. We hope, for the sake of our friends, and the family and friends of attorney Gregory Clark, that the Rockford police will rethink their current course and renew effort toward finding the real truth in this case.
  • How the Police Investigation of the Greg Clark Murder Went Astray

    The scenario on Wednesday, February 8, 2008, about 1:50 pm in the afternoon:

    The snow fall in Rockford, Illinois began the evening before and continued throughout the day. The snow accumulation was the heaviest experienced by the city in 10 years. The snowfall was so heavy that most businesses and all offices closed early or never opened, and for the first time in memory mail delivery did not even occur. At 1:50 pm, snow on the streets reached above car bumper level and visibility was poor.

    What happened: News media report that at 1:50 pm, attorney Greg Clark was home at his house in a quiet neighborhood on the east side of Rockford. According to the RRSTAR's latest summation of events from 2008: "A gunman springs from a van and opens fire, killing Gregory Clark, a Rockford attorney, who is clearing snow from his sidewalk." Clark was brutally shot in the back three times by an unknown shooter. He was pronounced dead at the hospital a short time later.

    News accounts and subsequent police action show that more than one perpetrator actively participated at Clark's shooting. Media reports show the police immediately focused upon Richard Wanke because of what they thought of him and not because of any of the evidence found at the murder site.

    The news reporter was told the next day that the police did not believe he shot Clark, but just that he was somehow involved. Subsequent questioning of Richard's acquaintances showed the police asking questions indicating they sought information about at least one other person other than Richard.

    Read the whole essay.

  • Sitemeter

  • About the Articles on this Blog:

    RichardWanke.com is written and updated by community volunteers. It's mission: publicity and assistance for the legal defense of IDOC inmate, Richard Wanke. This blog also features articles on topics affecting IL, IDOC, and IDOC inmates. Article information is gleaned from a variety of public media accounts and from other internet sources and reflects what we believe to be accurate. Readers are invited to respond and submit their own experiences.
  • Help Investigate This Story! Support Our Spot.us campaign! See Below!

    Click here to link to Richard's campaign Spot.us is a non-profit project to pioneer "community funded reporting". Through Spot.us, the public can commission investigations with tax deductible donations for important and perhaps overlooked media stories. Read this article at link to more information
  • IDOC Early Release & Good Time Credits Still Remain Suspended!

    All IDOC Early Release Programs were suspended in 12/2009. IDOC awarding of Supplemental & Meritorious Good Time Credits (SGT & MGT) were also subsequently suspended. No inmates are eligible for either, and while MGT may return in a more restrictive form, no Early Release program is anticipated. See: (here)

    Politicians have made the law more restrictive before IDOC once again awards any MGT. You can read the Erickson Report and IDOC's official plan for implementing MGT (here).

    Prison over-crowding is unlikely to be addressed by Quinn until Mid 2012 or later. It may or may not include MGT. Quinn's plan to close state facilities is changing again and prison closures may again be included. Discussions between Quinn and IDOC about prison overcrowding are happening, but any action on releasing inmates to relieve overcrowding will not happen till late 2012, if at all.

    We will keep readers posted of any news or changes when these occur. We also urge readers to check these online sites: (ILprisontalk.com), and the (John Howard Association), for other information

  • Important Email Addresses:

    Send a letter with your thoughts or questions to Richard Wanke. (If you want a reply, you must include your name and a regular mailing address.) freerichardwanke@gmail.com, or snailmail (and it is slow):

    Richard Wanke, K77902 Vienna CC, 6695 State Route #146 East, Vienna, IL 62995

    ____________________

    Express your frustration about IDOC, prison issues, or anything else to your IL State Representative or IL State Senator! Use this link to email them directly!: (Rep or Senator here)

    Send your thoughts to Congress!

    Thanks to reader prisonrightsadvocate, for letting us know of the following weblinks which you can use to directly email our US Rep, Don Manzullo and State Senator, Dick Durbin

    ____________________

    Send an opinion letter to the Rockford Register Star. (To be printed it must be less than 200 words, with name, address, and daytime phone number.) Opinions@RRStar.com

    Send an opinion letter to the Rock River Times. rrtimes@rworld.com

    Have you experienced problems with the Winnebago County legal system? Please write a short story about your incident for us to post. You can choose to add your name, or not. freerichardwanke@gmail.com

  • Subscribe

  • Archives

  • Spammers:

    Wordpress has excellent spam protection, and over 7,000 spams have been eliminated from this blog. Not to discourage legitimate postings and links, but if you post or comment to this blog with commercial content which is not informational and is not related to any of the topics featured on this blog, you are wasting your time (please note this jersery or shoe poster) and all your postings are removed in 2 secs daily. This blog is offered as an avenue for those interested in wrongful convictions, prison issues, misconduct, and social & economic issues pertaining to them, and to others who offer services to assist others on those issues.
  • Police Misconduct News Feed

    Error: Twitter did not respond. Please wait a few minutes and refresh this page.

Spot.Us Experiments With Citizen-Funded Community Journalism

As the article below shows, mainstream journalism is dying and perhaps the transition is already underway to “community reporting” that is market-driven, online, and accessible to community input. Spot.us.com is an encouraging example of this new journalism format which every community should consider supporting.

http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/11/10/spotus-experiments-with-citizen-funded-community-journalism/

by Erick Schonfeld on November 10, 2008

Newspapers are dying across the country. Local papers are shutting down, Gannett is laying off 3,000 people, the Christian Science Monitor will no longer put out a print edition, and even the New York Times is facing a serious cash crunch. Can citizen journalism fill in the gaps?

David Cohn thinks so. Today, he launches Spot.Us, a not-for-profit experiment in community-funded journalism. The site is a hub where freelance journalists can pitch story ideas and readers can pitch in money to pay the journalists to report and write the story. The focus of the site is on local, community issues around the San Francisco Bay area—the kind that supposedly get short shrift by city newspapers. But Cohn hopes to expand the concept to other communities.

Some of the pitches on the site now include

How safe are San Francisco Bay beaches and water a year after the Cosco Busan oil spill?

No dog park in Pacifica?

Why Won’t the CA PUC Enforce California’s Robocall Ban?

In contrast to other citizen journalism sites such as CNN’s iReport, NowPublic, GroundReport, or CJReport, there is not much room for citizens to participate in the journalism other than voting with their cash and submitting tips. Especially when it comes to local issues, local citizens are often better informed than an outside journalist. But turning the entire process over to readers doesn’t always produce the desired results either, as CNN found out recently withe the false “ireport” of Steve Jobs having a heart attack.

The site is part of a trend, though, in what I call mediated citizen journalism. There are still some controls in place. For instance, the Examiner.com is approaching local news by creating a virtual newsroom out of a corps of regular citizens, whose blog posts are vetted. Similarly, TC50 startup IamNews, allows any media site to turn its readers into reporters without giving them access to the publish button. Spot.US could add a little more participation to the process.

Also, I am a little bit suspect that the tip jar approach is going to produce quality journalism. Most people don’t care enough about these issues to a pay a couple bucks for the local paper, much less pitch in $10 or $50 to send a reporter out to write a story that they might not see for days or weeks. If Spot.US wants to engage citizens in creating quality journalism, they have to be able to contribute to the research and writing themselves, and even share a byline.

Below is an email Q&A I conducted with Cohn about Spot.Us:

Q: How will this work exactly?

1. Anyone can create a “story tip” – and people can pledge to it. An example of a tip.
2. Reporters create pitches – people donate to pitches (real money is exchanged).
3. Finished content is made available to be republished for free UNLESS a news organization buys exclusive rights to an article. If a news organizations wants exclusive rights they must either (a. Donate 50% towards a pitch early or (b. if the community has funded 51% or more – then a news org must donate 100% towards the pitch with extra proceeds going back to the original donor (similar to Kiva.org model).

Q: Who can become a Journalist?

Anyone can be a journalist. I decided NOT to try and define who is and isn’t a journalist. I thought that would be a step backwards. BUT: On a pitch you must explain your qualifications and journalists are encouraged to fill out their profiles which include giving their work history and work samples. We also encourage donors to look at a journalists profile before they donate.

Q: How are the prices set?

Right now the prices are set by the independent freelance journalists. But you must explain what you will deliver and justify the money you are asking for.

Q: How is the money split up, where does it go?

90% of the money goes to the reporter who pitched the investigation. The other 10% goes to an independent fact-check editor that is assigned to the story. This person is actually another journalist in our system, not a Spot.Us staffer. The Fact-Check editor’s job is to do fact-checking and ensure fairness in the reporting. They must approve the final story before it is published.

Q: Where does the story appear? Who enforces deadlines? Are there any deadlines?

The story will appear on Spot.Us but will be made available to any news organization to republish for free. The only exception to this is if a news organization pays 50% or more towards a pitch. In that case – they get first publishing rights to the article.

There are no deadlines – but the reporter isn’t paid until the pitch is published. We try and find pitches that are evergreens. We don’t suspect it is possible to crowdfund to hire a reporter to cover the fire across the street ;)

Q:Why only local stories? Aren’t there big, juicy, national stories that need to be told (and that would attract more funding)?

Good question with a few answers.
1. The Knight News Challenge which funded Spot.Us is supporting research and development that would support local reporting.

2. We believe there will always be large national news organizations like the NY Times, WaPo and CNN. But local newspapers are starting to face real hardships and it’s reasonable to imagine a world where local papers like the SF Chronicle, or Cincinnati Enq, etc disappear.

These papers played an important role in our local democracies and we want to make sure that the role they played continues. Journalism will survive the death of its institutions. We do hope to expand to other regions beyond the SF Bay Area soon – but we want to prove ourselves in this market before we expand.

Q: Is Spot.us set up simply to present pitches, gather tips and funding, or are here tools for letting the crowd help report the story as well?

Right now, the only way the public can participate is by donating to a story or creating a story tip. In the future – we want to let them be fact-checkers, leave comments on stories and even donate man-hours towards pitches, instead of just money.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 31 other followers